Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2009

December 12, 2009 by

10:30 – 12:00 pm
Rm. 5-231

Agenda

  1. Finalizing the Charter and working-group for the Athena Cluster transitions.
  2. CET process for exploring and developing strategy for future learning environments (e-Learning / hybrid) at MIT.
    • As MIT looks ahead to possible increased activity in online learning, it would be useful to:
      • Get some calibration on how other institutions are taking advantage of new technology For example It would be useful to consider how technology is changing the opportunities for activities like joint courses and projects across institutions and for increased use of telecommunication. This would be consistent with one of MICET’s functions to undertake periodic reviews aimed at assessing educational technology in industry and in MIT’s peer Institutions. (This has not been done as a council since MITCET was first formed in 1999)
      • Understand the implications of current educational technology initiatives at MIT on areas such as personalization of the learning process; deeper learning, learning content development, global learning experiences and bring and bringing research tools to learning.
Filed Under: 2009, CET Agendas

Monday, Nov. 23, 2009

November 23, 2009 by

10:00 – 11:00 am
Rm. 12-196

Agenda

  1. Finalizing CET Statement on Educational Video Services Strategy.
    This statement was sent to all MITCET members for comments.
  2. Recommendations for Athena Clusters from Institute Task Force: Process for understanding implications and developing strategy for student computing environment and technology enabled learning spaces.
  3. CET process for exploring and developing strategy for future learning environments (e-Learning / hybrid) at MIT.
    • Get calibration on how other institutions are taking advantage of new technology For example It would be useful to consider how technology is changing the opportunities for activities like joint courses and projects across institutions and for increased use of telecommunication. This would be consistent with one of MICET’s functions to undertake periodic reviews aimed at assessing educational technology in industry and in MIT’s peer institutions. (This has not been done as a council since MITCET was first formed in 1999)
    • Understand the implications of current educational technology initiatives at MIT on areas such as personalization of the learning process; deeper learning, learning content development, global learning experiences and bring and bringing research tools to learning.
Filed Under: 2009, CET Agendas

Friday, October 23, 2009

October 23, 2009 by

3:00 – 4:30 pm
Rm. 12-196

Agenda

  1. Recommendations on video infrastructure/services for education.Following the presentation at our last meeting, an updated report and recommendations are being prepared by the team which will be distributed in advance of the meeting. The report will serve as the basis for the discussion and MITCET recommendations.
  2. Advisory Committee and directions for Course /Learning Management Systems: (Eric Klopfer)
  3. General Information Updates.
Filed Under: 2009, CET Agendas

Friday, September 25, 2009

September 25, 2009 by

8:00 – 9:15 am
Rm. 11-103

Agenda

  1. Welcome, Agenda Overview and Membership Update: Dan Hastings, Hal Abelson.
  2. Discussion of MITCET Charter and activities, in light of emergent opportunities: MITCET’s engagement in relation to recommendations from the Institute Task Forces for responding to the budget situation, specifically
    • E-learning and other technology-enabled opportunities for greater effectiveness/efficiency and transformation.
    • Student computing infrastructure.
  3. Presentation and review of recommendations for MIT Video Services/infrastructure (Steve Gass et al). Recommendations sent in advance of the meeting for review.
  4. Agenda topics for future meetings – recommendations and review.
Filed Under: 2009, CET Agendas

Friday, May 9, 2009

May 9, 2009 by

1:30 – 3:00 p.m.
Rm. 11-103

Agenda

  1. Brief Reports from educational technology related advisory committees**: addressing the scope/mission and key issues . This would be useful step in understanding, rationalizing and establishing the linkages with CET.
    **(A subset of advisory groups from the following initiatives; OCW; Stellar; DOS; Subject Evaluation; Student Systems Visions)
  2. Follow up on the Institutional Budget Task Force on Education
    • Updates and Next Steps
  3. Updates:
    • Microsoft Research iCampus Student Innovation Prize
    • Global Experience Proposals
Filed Under: 2009, CET Agendas
Next Page »